Compare conventional vs. energy optimized settlements






Point-for-point compare why the energy-optimized settlement is far cheaper than the conventional approach. Let's start underground with the garage. Makes 32,000 € to 42,000 € per place in middle Europe, but it is common that 2 places have to be for one apartment. Here are the first 64,000 € to 84,000 € for the apartment. At the energy-optimized settlement, there are garages and parking places below the central photovoltaic structure. Garages below 10,000 € per place, the central photovoltaic is like a huge carport. Let's have one garage place and one parking place. What to do with the difference? Let's have 80 kW photovoltaic and 240 kWh batteries! We only finished to compare the underground, and we have already discovered the money for the energy transition. But we are far away from finished. Only mass helps against impact sound. In a multi-story residential building, such a ceiling is 300 to 350 mm thick throughout. One square meter weighs 500 kg to 600 kg. But that is not one square meter of living space, because in buildings of this type, only 70% of the total area is living space. So that's 700 kg to 850 kg just for the ceiling for one square meter of living space. At the GEMINI house, the floor separating the living area from the drawer system below is less than 5% of this weight. How do you stop noise over the shortest distance? Sound insulation is a decisive factor for residential satisfaction. Again, this can only be achieved on short distances with mass, a lot of mass. Because the neighbor's stereo system can be louder than the traffic noise outside, the partition walls between apartments are also heavier than the exterior walls. The partition walls between apartments weigh 300 kg to 550 kg per m², while the exterior walls weigh only 180 kg to 350 kg per m² of wall space. We use some optimizations for acoustic insulation between rooms inside the GEMINI house, but in a single-family house, no strong acoustic separation is required. The outside wall is less than 30 kg/m². Compare conventional vs. energy optimized settlements
Point-for-point compare why the energy-optimized settlement is far cheaper than the conventional approach. Let's start underground with the underground garage. A Boeing 747 carrying a space shuttle makes 322 tons of takeoff weight. Or the weight of 5 Abrams M1 main battle tanks. An 100 m² apartment with 2 places in the underground garage can also be up to 322 tons of construction material. This is an enormous material battle to make it reasonably bearable for people to live together in a very small area. Can we continue to afford this type of newly built housing, or must it be considered a luxury for private buyers? Do we want an energy transition? Do we want climate protection? Then such material battles must be called into question.
-250% CO2 emission until 350 ppm are reached again -250% CO2 emission until 350 ppm are reached again
Less CO2 emission is much too little, even zero emission is insufficient. Only a planet renovation with large-scale CO2 filtering and splitting from the atmosphere will help.
Filtering and splitting CO2 from the atmosphere Filtering and splitting CO2 from the atmosphere
Due to their enormous space and water requirements, plants are unsuitable for the necessary reduction of the CO2 content in the atmosphere. There is no room for 37 million km² of growing forest.
390 PWh/year electricity for CO2 from the atmosphere 390 PWh/year electricity for CO2 from the atmosphere
Reduce the CO2 content with Power to Carbon, generate fuels with Power to Liquid and use CO2 for indoor plant cultivation to replace large-scale agriculture.
Carbon fiber becomes standard material for construction Carbon fiber becomes standard material for construction
If we filter the 33.1 Gt CO2 emission of 2019 from the atmosphere and split it into C and O, we get 9 billion tons of carbon. What to do with it?
IPCC Report 2021: “Net Zero Emissions” Fairy Tale and its Devastating Consequences IPCC Report 2021: “Net Zero Emissions” Fairy Tale and its Devastating Consequences
Constantly contradicting itself, the IPCC 2021 report adheres to the completely inadequate “net zero emissions” target. This can only be thinking prohibitions.
Green dogmatism and the destruction of the German photovoltaic industry Green dogmatism and the destruction of the German photovoltaic industry
How the dogma “the demand for electricity will decrease” led to extremely wrong targets, which led to the destruction of the German photovoltaic industry in 2013.
Why Germany is failing in the energy transition Why Germany is failing in the energy transition
In the first decade of the new millennium, Germany was the great role model in the energy transition, why, on the other hand, the current EEG policy leads to disaster.
Sri Lanka crisis 2022 example of oil exit failures Sri Lanka crisis 2022 example of oil exit failures
Hit hard by the breakdown in tourism caused by COVID-19, the higher price of oil comes as the next blow. The serious failures of the industrialized countries.
Destructive cult prevents functional energy transition Destructive cult prevents functional energy transition
A horror novel about a world without renewable energy and recycling delayed a workable energy transition and thus effective climate protection by decades.
Functional energy transition vs. German energy transition Functional energy transition vs. German energy transition
We have to denounce very hard the grotesque German energy transition in order to turn all the enemies of this grotesque into fans of a functional energy transition.
Paradigm changes – Profitability transitions – Culture shocks
We can neither achieve energy transition nor stop climate change if we do not constantly review all parameters and abandon unsuitable views.
Cost optimization — the key to energy transition and climate protection
Paper written for the CORP.at conference March 22 to 25, 2026, in Vienna. My 2025 participation was a last-minute action, but now I have much time to prepare the paper.


  Cost optimization — the key to energy transition and climate protection
Paper written for the CORP.at conference March 22 to 25, 2026, in Vienna. My 2025 participation was a last-minute action, but now I have much time to prepare the paper.

Abstract
To meet the necessary cost optimization targets, we cannot hold the energy problem separate from all other problems: another major problem is housing.
Introduction
Many imaginations about our future had been created in the past with completely different parameters. Unchecked conclusions from the past endanger our future with unbearable costs.
My personal experience with a profitability transition My personal experience with a profitability transition
Birds can fly without knowing all the terms of aerodynamics. I reacted with my design change to an ongoing “profitability transition” without knowing the term at this time.
Energy transition
The long way from random electricity from sun and wind towards 24×365 electricity. Overseen profitability transitions have to be considered as major accidents.
The GEMINI principle: double usage of land
No better solar power plant, no better housing possible on the same ground is the ultimate target of the GEMINI principle.
Off-grid fast charging settlements Off-grid fast charging settlements
It can start small, somewhere in a village, with a single GEMINI house with a big PV carport and 100 kW DC charging.
Energy-intensive industry
I once developed a scale for off-grid solar possibilities depending on photovoltaic size. But now is to make a big jump upwards on this scale: running, energy-intensive industry.
Agriculture: How many square meters does a human need for his food? Agriculture: How many square meters does a human need for his food?
Mankind started as hunters and gatherers. 12,000 years ago, 500,000 m² to 2,500,000 m² per human. With the agricultural revolution, the land use was reduced by 2 magnitudes.
Conclusion
All parameters are in a constant state of change. We have to check all the parameters and predict the development for the predictable future.
References
Roland Mösl: Energy Optimised Settlements – Enabler for Necessary Civilization Targets, Graz 2025


          Compare conventional vs. energy optimized settlements: Point-for-point compare why the energy-optimized settlement is far cheaper than the conventional approach. Let's start underground with the underground garage. https://climate.pege.org/2026-corp/compare.htm